<-------- return to index

COLLABORATIVE NOTES

SqEK meeting 2019


@Madrid / ESP


[ October 23-26 ]




See full event programme here.

Contributions to notes:
    david@totalism.org (also email for support), Miguel, Faustine, XYZ
    <--- (please add yourself here, if you like)


Table of Contents
1 *** (Meta)
1.1     (References)
1.2     (Symbols)
2 *** Day 0: MEETUP (@Achuri)
3 *** Day 1 (Oct 24): ETHNICITY, MIGRATION, DIVERSITY (@ La Casika)
3.1 (Introduction & Housekeeping)
3.1.1   (tour of La Casika)
3.1.2   (photography and recording consents)
3.1.3   (sleeping at Ingobernable)
3.2 East London Bengali Squatters, Tower Hamlets, 1970s (Shabna Begum - Queen Mary's London)
3.2.1     >>><<<
3.3 Translating the Commons: Orfanotrofio housing squat for immigrants as a space of political subjectification across difference (Lazaros Karaliotas & Matina Kapsali)
3.3.1     >>><<<
3.4 Refugee Housing Squats as Commons - The case of Athens and the City Plaza Hotel (Nikolas Kanavaris)
3.4.1     >>><<<
3.5 Film screening and discussion
3.6 Discussion about the squatted space La Dignidad (18 housing flats)
3.6.1     >>><<< Stop Desahucios Móstoles introduced their collective
4 *** DAY 2 (Oct 25): SQUATTING FOR HOUSING AND COMMONS (@ EKO)
4.1 Presentation 1 Hande Gulen: Neighborhood and activism in Istanbul: space, locality and the new political forms
4.2 Presentation 2 Begüm Özden Fırat > “Emek will not bow down to capital” Creation of Urban Commons and regimes of enclosure in İstanbul
4.3 Counter-Archives (Sam)
4.4 Lukas: article for Partecipazione ed Conflitto (PaCo) onhorizontality in a squatting community
4.5 Evening debate with Madrid activists from PAVPS, Carabanchel Housing Group and Sindicato de Inquilinas (Tenants' Union)
5 *** Day 3 (Oct 26): EVALUATION MEETING (@ La Canica)



*** (Meta)


    (References)

### add canonical links and resources

Places and organisations in Madrid / Spain:
    * Achuri
    * PAH
    * La Casika
    * EKO
    * Ingobernable
    * La Canica
    * [...]

Important events (mentioned several times during conference):
    * EU-Turkey agreement (when ###, etc)
    * Criminalization of corporate property squatting in UK
    * Taksim Gezi Park protests
    * [...]




    (Symbols)

### / ??? : clear up / fix / explain / confirm / do something
<<< : added, ammended
>>> : question answered
@ : (this is in slides)
&&& : asking for open assistance / proposition for common work
[...] : missed / unwritten
>>>...<<< : questions & comments









*** Day 0: MEETUP (@Achuri)

Welcome to Madrid !

Organisational:
    The programme was presented 2 days before.
    Together with this, the fact it was not possible to guarantee free accommodation 

Shared dinner at cooperative bar Achuri, Lavapies. (7€ pp.)





*** Day 1 (Oct 24): ETHNICITY, MIGRATION, DIVERSITY (@ La Casika)


(Introduction & Housekeeping)


(pah activist)
[...]
Her apartment is getting evicted Nov 7.


(0950 : presenting the space)

[...]

It's now rare to have squats in the periphery of Madrid. There were most in past years.
The administration wants to demolish this place as part of their renovation plan of the Mostoles city center. 4th attempt. Probably the city & the property will succeed this time.
The court cases took different judicial paths (criminal, civil, administrative,...). Now it's administrative.
Programme:
    self defense, yoga, feminist groups, animal rights groups, prison support, drug addiction assistence, etc., both by activist groups and people from the neigbourhood
The money from these activities is used for political purposes.
Occupation comes from an antifascist group. Here for 22 years!!
The biggest success of the collective is to have stopped 3 eviction attempts all this time. This happened with juidicial successes: the government made mistakes, and they were able to identify them.
Also organizes:
    * Corto y cambio festival - popular short film festival
    * jazz festival
    * participate in other self-managed organizations and in the events of Mostoles city


(1010 : see the space)
activities:
    * summer concerts
    * wall climbing
    * [...]

courtyard / patio:
    * "messages on the walls are related to particular political issues"
    * dedication to Santi, activist attacked by fascists, who became disable and committed sucide
    * [...]
the bar
< photos >


____________

upstairs:
    "the floor is not stable to hold a lot of people" It's a very old low-rise building.

? how did you establish it is not safe
"there is people at our assemblies who know about these things"

there was a lot of refurbishments in the house, "to keep it alive"

The place is used as a social center but offers support for people with housing issues.

  (tour of La Casika)


  (photography and recording consents)

1040
do we record?
"it is public, so we are not supposed to talk about confidential issues anyway"

-- "I don't want to have a trace of it."

"In Spain we like to take photographs, so we can show to the outside there is many people."

Systems:
    a) "opt-in"
    b) "opt-out" <-- we agree on this, and inform everyone about it
###


  (sleeping at Ingobernable)

"if you want to take the risk of eviction, you can go there"
There are 5 places:
    "but you risk getting arrested"
    not planning on resisting eviction.
    there is a fund ready to help with any legal proceedings costs to involved.
There is an alert group there.

We are invited to go to a solidarity party for minors migrants there, tomorrow.



((( today they're related to migration )))


    East London Bengali Squatters, Tower Hamlets, 1970s (Shabna Begum - Queen Mary's London)

    (1053...tech setup...1100)

    (year into phd @ Queen Mary's University London: Bengali 1970s historic squatting)

    Interest in the HOME - migrant home-making.in a new environment. Home as a space which is meaningful but also political. Home as a radical space, connected to public space (Feminist geography).
    Space for solidarity and resistance. Home as a material and affective space, of belonging and identity. Connections of home in London and home in Bangladesh.

    Method: Oral history of people who were involved in the Bengali squatting, and (now 40 years later) how people reflect upon and feel about those experience, how they feel about home.

    Bengali squatters occupied whole blocks of flats in East London, Spitalfields.
    East India Company had offices there (400 years ago). 41% living there are still, now, Bangladeshi.

    1950/60s many migrant men arrived, being invited.
    1970s saw changes in immigration laws, restricting rights of families to come with them.
    Housing situation was very precarious. There were sleeping shifts (hotbunking). 
    Council had a racist housing allocation system - preventing Bengalis from getting on the waiting lists. They were housed separately.
    At the same time, there was "popular violent racism" from skinheads (National Front).

    Bengali people came together and formed the BHAG (Bengali Housing Action Group):
        translation of 'Bhag' in Bengali is 'Tiger' (radical, fierce) and 'Share' 
    (collective, community).
    They squatted entire streets, blocks of flats.
    Strategy to squat in density = security, safety, establish vigilante patrols. 
    Home extended onto the street. To be at home was understood as to be safe in your community, in your area.
    They did this for 2 years, pressuring the council to provide better conditions.

    "They identified with the black power movement" - adopting a racial identity.
    I saw this (migration squatting) narrative as absent, and these accounts in danger of being lost.
    Its TELLING in squatting research = whose voices are heard, and whose are lost.

    Accounts of daily lives in squatting:
        * Matt Cook in 1970s: work with gay squats and their "everyday lived experience" - new family dynamics & domestic arrangements
        ‘Gay Times’: Identity, Locality, Memory, and the Brixton Squats in 1970's London / https://academic.oup.com/tcbh/article-abstract/24/1/84/1733544
        * Christine Wall (???): feminist squats in 1970s
    Sisterhood and Squatting in the 1970s: Feminism, Housing and Urban Change in Hackney [OPEN ACCESS] / https://academic.oup.com/hwj/article/83/1/79/3862507

    Getting accounts of politics of the movement.

    How do migrants change spaces in order to make it homely?

    Making money and sending it back to Bangladesh (remittance), influenced their decisions.
    They also created an internal mini economy, creating new services.

    Research method:
        It's their account, their voice
        I conduct interviews with them in Bengali, meaning it will all have to be translated.
        Unique problems: for example, Bengali does not have a direct match with the word "home".

    5 men, 3 women
    "They found it funny that I asked them about their kitchens, their carpentry".
    Why:
        * perhaps they didn't spend a lot of time there?
        * problem of embarrasment - (conditions were often poor, dilapidated)

    Would appreciate help and advice with the research!



        >>><<<
    (1120)
    1 (S):
        This is also important for the current squatting culture and its awareness of its history.
        Is often related to Tower hamlets (### explain).
        Suggestion to keep original words sometimes. 

    2 (H):
        Similar oral history research project in 1975 (###).
        Connection to housing scene by Puerto Ricans in NYC (###).
        "These are exceptional cases - more often, migrants were not organising like this."
        ____________
        >>>
        Bengalis felt directly targeted. This is why they saw themselves as a cohesive group - with a separate housing interest.
        They did get support from white squatters (?###) that supported them - also legally, etc.

    3 ():
        Do they call themselves "squatters"?
        >>>:
            Yes - they use the english word.
            At this time, for them, it was not a bad word. It was not criminalised then.

    ### I'm interested in the consequences of these decisions:
        "We would've been better off if we chose X"
        "This was also temporary for them".

    4 ():
        Since the 1990s there's been a criminalization (especially corporate).
        Lots of people now use the word "occupy", not "squat" - because of the media campaign.

    5 (Y):
        "How can we study home-making in an ethical way?"
        Talking later (perhaps decades later) looks like a better idea, because people are not endangered any more.

    6 ():
        "Racialised identity": is there more research?
        Mentioned Florence Bouillon (###) - "not sure if it's translated in ENG" (she published a chapter in the first SqEK book, 2013).
        >>>:
            "Race today" published a journal - focus on black working class, etc.
        _________
        <<<(S):
        "Great website":
            Remembering Olive [Morris] collective (ROC) - group at "56A" (###) , addressing forgotten history of Black Panther squatting.

    (1140)



    Translating the Commons: Orfanotrofio housing squat for immigrants as a space of political subjectification across difference (Lazaros Karaliotas & Matina Kapsali)

    (add affil ###)

    Thessaloniki, Greece
    June 2016

    # (@ == symbol for "is written in slides")
    @ Squatting disrupts the existing (dominant) ordering of our cities, but also construct political spaces of solidarity. Spaces of and for politics.

    @ Ranciere: "politics is world-making ... production of emancipatory realities" ... must be created by outcasts to hegemony
    @ Dissensus is important ! Equality is pressuposed (not a destination)!
    Citation: Ranciere 'Ten Theses on Politics' [OPEN ACCESS} http://www.after1968.org/app/webroot/uploads/RanciereTHESESONPOLITICS.pdf

    I made informal conversations with migrants & activists.

    #/// it seems she has great slides, so best to just include them and try to focus to note if anything goes beyond them / is the idea to post the slides on here? .. i suppose yes, would be good to check up with authors before if they'r ok with that but i suppose yes

    initiatives:
        * organising legal support groups
        * self-org refugee squats "also on the islands", "huge part of this wave of solidarity"

    @ ( refugee wave map )
    Corridors of solidarity = via Turkey through Balkans to Europe / includes squats and makeshift camps.

    (before was a housing squat, resquatted, owned by Orthodox church)
    families with children lived there, approx 70pp, 30% women


    @ (institutions of commoning !!)

    "Rules of community"

    'we are not a state organisation / we are not an NGO' - anti-humanitarian governance / autonomous
    <<<(S) Really good recent special issue on this: 
        (2019) Citizenship as inhabitance? Migrant housing squats versus institutional accommodation (Citizenship Studies) https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ccst20/23/6


    @ ( 2. Living in common )

    Everyday life in squats:
        collecting goods and provisions
        making events together ("meaningful encounters")
        etc

    @ (perspective: Camps vs Squat inhabitants)

    @ (people desire company!)



    @ ( 3. Fighting in common )

    ___

    2016 building evicted & demolished !

    !! two quotes : total mismatch of "official" vs "resident" narrative

    @ orfanotrofio: an intensive political experiment



        >>><<<

    (~1204)

    1 (S): tensions between (1) refguees looking to work with the state and find place to stay/access services & (2) squatter political aims to maintain autonomous spaces and not work with/resist state.
    <<<
    Conflicting motivation "cause tensions in the squats everyday".

    2 (M):
        what network was built? how was it different from previous anarcho squat networks?
        >>>:
            similar to ??? movement since 2010
            not so many commonalities with "traditional squat movements" of greece
            more connected to ???
            ... but still using same symbols and relying on similar infrastructure
            "ordinary people participated"

    3 (Y):
        in athens, City Plaza ... mentions inter-squat ("people of every squat making connections")

    4 (): ???
        >>>:
            when it was evicted, many were moved to camps, but many were taken by friends they made while squatting

    5 (pink):
        "big assemblies in athens were organised ... one kitchen for all squats in area ... assembly was really good ... great ideas"
        "it's very powerful to do these networks in the city"
        "people were supporting refugees by letting them use places they couldn't rent out"

    6 (M):
        after Turkey & EU agreement? ... what happened to displaced people?
        >>>:
            ~ summer of 2016 : the camps were quite open (Creo, Cassikas sp###) ... but people were desperate ... paid a lot of money to cross
            they started "Registration":
                white paper to move inside Greece,
                they could choose countries they wanted to go to.
                each country would "choose" what kind of refugees they would want
                In Spain it was Red Cross: taught spanish, hosted in hostels ... after 6 months they get a work permit

    7 (D):
        how did governance work - how did they decide who to accept? did this create tensions?
        >>>:
            they knew each other from Idomeni (camp at border) ... and came together to squat
            "there were not so many ... it wasn't really selection ... even in the most crowded period"
            also they were told "living has its dangers ... cops can come, etc"

    8 (M):
        "we always have the issue to understand if squatting is empowering people ... or not"
        was it crucial that it was a squat (or could it have been something different)?
        >>>:
            ???
        <<<:
            "for them it was something that was going to end ... they knew they had to work together"
        ________
        ×××:
            "It's not the same to have it rented on and off-the market!"
            "with normal places comes contract responsibility, hierarchy, etc ... disabling self-organisation"
            So: Rented ok - but how? This completely changes the relationship.

    9 (D):
        proposed: work group for "patterns" classification:
            &&& (and looking for collaboration)




    Refugee Housing Squats as Commons - The case of Athens and the City Plaza Hotel (Nikolas Kanavaris)

    (architect, etc)
    Plaza Hotel ... used to be a hotel.

    Context:
        Change of government to right wing (in September 2019), from Syriza (center-left) that was in power since 2015.

    "You could have heard about it as an anarchist ghetto" - Exarcheia
    ... Guardian: Inside Exarcheia: the self-governing community Athens police want rid of / https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/aug/26/athens-police-poised-to-evict-refugees-from-squatted-housing-projects

    @ map
    "it was a viral situation" ... "mostly after EU-turkey agreement"

    "My attempt is to go and see the internal of squats ... using the theory of commons."

    Crucial - to see places as Heterotopias:
        can work as both closed and open
        are effected by external relations, but can work against them

    To theorize the "commoning" process:
        as a "relational practice", "creating a new ethos".
        focused on these asymetries of power relations, and to give them meaning.

    Concept of "hospitality" at different scales (state, regional, local, etc):
        ethics - power - space
        enables subjects to encounter and transform each others identity

    "Perception of hospitality, in greek terms, was totally transformed in 2015"

    I want to remap Hospitality as radical solidarity... using tools of spatial approach.

    __________

    @ space diagrams:
        * "selfness" vs "otherness"
        * sectors ###:
            * ORGANIZATION
            * RECEPTION
            * FOOD (kitchen, dining room):
                a main comon space
                also, general assemblies happen here
            * MORE PRIVATE:
                as "neighbourhood -> corridor -> threshold -> room"
        * [...]

    "These places were not designed to be a playground for a hundred kids ... but can be established in a squat"

    In many rooms, people had their luggage 'ready to go'.

    Many places were evicted, in the case of City Plaza - took the decision not be evicted, but voluntarily close.



        >>><<<

    1 (D)
        did you adopt the syntax of spatial approach, or create it?
        >>>:
            stavridis : common space - city as commons
            it's not an existing language of encoding "space flows"
            ### verify
            ------------------
            savdarov:
                in "the new commons and right to the city"
                says "spaces work in a similar way"

    2 (M):
        what is the difference with thessaloniki situation?
        >>>:
            



    Film screening and discussion



    Discussion about the squatted space La Dignidad (18 housing flats)

    (statement is read and translated)

    [...]

    (~1908)

    We get legal advice from a "legal comission", we have templates.
    A contract clause was found to be abusive by EU court (and had to be taken off the contract). A lot of procedures are now "stuck in court". ("vencimiento anticipado"?
    Another one - you couldn't appeal, but the bank could. 

    Got 80.000 signatures under a petition to do a new housing law
    However, it was not discussed in the Madrid Assembly (Regional Government), as it was a right-wing government.

    Now, it will be even more difficult, as per the government.
    But we keep fighting !

    We have a diverse team - we have lawyers, we have "somebody to stand at the door", etc.

    Even though most of us don't come from law, we learned things that we can now pass on to empower people.


        >>><<< Stop Desahucios Móstoles introduced their collective
        
    One of the approx 10 weekly district assemblies against evictions in Madrid, dealing with mortgages, tenant issues and squats (after it's been a hard point at the beggining).
    The assemblies offer juridical support in a principle of "pair-to-pair

    1: How do evictions happen in different places?

    >>> London:
        Housing price is characterised by speculation. The more houses are empty, it makes land value rise.
        [...]
        People are given housing, but all over the country.
        It varies - notable are violent evictions of barricaded squats (using dogs, pneumatic door breaking robots, etc).

    >>> France:
        Lots of empty buildings are public. Occupying points to the responsibility of the authorities. This happens many time because the government has a bad management of his own domain. Also real estate buys old buildings to later rebuild them - a form of speculative behaviour. If you occupy and prove you've stayed longer than 48 hours, you enter a judical process, depending on the situation. If minors, or vulnerable people (disabled, etc) are involved, special processes are applied ("social diagnosis"). In the context of Marseille, usually the persons considered as vulnerable  get up to 3 nights accomodated after being evicted. There is also "the winter truce" - no eviction between December-March. A law to structurally criminalize squatting was intented in 2018 but blocked at  the Parliament vote.

    >>> NL:
        Often people don't resist. Sometimes they chain themselves, and it takes more effort to do that.
        Normally it's a fine (a few 100€), in theory you can get up to 3 years of prison, if resisting.
        It's not common to evict poor people.

    >>> Sweden:
        Housing used to be affordable. Now there is foreign speculation, forcing rents higher, and forcible evictions of renters unable to pay. [...]




    *** DAY 2 (Oct 25): SQUATTING FOR HOUSING AND COMMONS (@ EKO)

    Introduction to the squat EKO and visit to all the floors and the roof, with brand new solar pannels.

    In the morning, we skip the presentations and went to a Stop Desahucios action. Legal warnings were made in advance. Police did not show up. We stay for a few hours in front of the door and chatted with activists and neighbours (around 30 people). Squatters were in the apartment for more than 5 years. There were many more squatted apartments in the same street. Mostly, Roma people. Some were participants in the local Housing Group, the PAH or the Tenants' Union. The eviction was halted / postponed, because due to the common process in Madrid to sell and re-sell flats between investment funds and banks, the entity asking for eviction was not the same on the property titlle, so it has been blocked by the judicial secretary.
     It was celebrated with a final "family picture" circulated online. The presence of the approx 20 SqeKers, so a big part of the mobilisation, has been apreciated by the family involved.

    Presentation 1 Hande Gulen: Neighborhood and activism in Istanbul: space, locality and the new political forms

    (~1535)

    // I couldn't hear a thing //.

    The person had a really precise power point in English, could we had it to the report?


    Presentation 2 Begüm Özden Fırat > “Emek will not bow down to capital” Creation of Urban Commons and regimes of enclosure in İstanbul

    (~1608 )

    Previous to Gezi protests.
    This is just before. When the movie cinema was demolished.

    Talk beyond dichotomy of "state" and "private property regimes".
    How can we "common" property ?
    Practice it in a such a way that it's not "private" property, but something else?

    I will try to expand the notion of property. We as activists don't discuss forms of private/state property.
    "This construct can always be undone and redone".

    Theater is "Emec" (means "Labour"). (Wordplay gives the slogan of resistance / title talk).
    For generations, the film embodied had the feeling of "being an Instambulate", and was also a subcultural space.
    In 1987 May 1st celebrations were celebrated here - even though generally it was banned since the 80s coup d'etat. So, it has a radical heritage.
    Located in Taksim - cultural and political heart/hotspot of Turkey. 

    In 2009 it was announced it will be closed.

    In 2010, a fake announcement was made of a "film festival opening" - even though the place was closed. When the people came, the protests had been announced. Almost every month, there was a demo against the demolition. Some marches brought 3000 people - it was a symbol of gentrification of Istambul. Actions (or, tactics) performed:
        * marches
        * urban activism
        * famous film people gave the movement a face
        * the street in front of the theatre was "kept busy" (occupied) all the time
        * [...]

    People "acting like the state", asking for a "common property".
    The place was seen as "common use property".
    "By using - we own it", was a tagline.

    We produced space as "common" - not "commons", by performing everyday acts.

    The space belonged to Jewish owners, but was confiscated after the 1942 "non-muslim citizen tax" law.
    This informed the participants on how property is made !

    This is seen as not unlike what states do now in neoliberal times. They confiscate buildings, then sell them again later.

    "Squatting is a way of de-property-making. We have to think about how that property was made, before."
    "It's not our responsibility to change the past, but also to rethink it, we have to think about violent acts that came before our activist ones today."

    A researcher of English commoners of the 13th century was mentioned (Peter Linebaugh).
    He argues that besides only "contracts", "acts" should also be considered.

    >>><<<

    (1) Why wasn't it occupied?
    It was too big. There was no neighbourhood around to keep it.

    (2) In Italy there was a wave of theater occupations. Like Teatro Valle. The fact it was in the center was considered a factor in favour of occupation.
    The difference (and problem) was, the film people were not invoved directly. The reason is probably that they're not unionized as well.

    (3) Anecdote: In the Netherlands they occupied a building by inviting the mayor to attend a party. The police asked the mayor if it's OK, and they confirmed it. It's still kept today!

    (4) Police repression always depends on many factors:
        Maybe centrality makes it more likely to be evicted?
        ---------
        Squats in Kadikoy (###) survived, because it was just after Gezi. Police was not ready to attack them, especially in a "republican" neighbourhood.




    Counter-Archives (Sam)

    archive, power of archive. importance of it.

    "this city is an archive - squatting history, urban authority"

    storing, interpreting, etc... of data ... establishes authority.
    as the state/city does this, it has the authority to say what the city/country is.

    archives - records offices, museums, libraries ... have been used by states, to establish power.
    this is especially visible in colonial situations - powers establishing archives, to do the above.

    derrida wrote about this.
    "no political control without control of the archive".

    they are centers of interpretation. they claim power to "know better than everyone else".
    in England, libraries were established to force liberalism over cities (in 19th century).
    governments gave money to build them - but no money for the books...
    similar with museums - a "sanctuary for the national memory".

    archives assert there is a "we", with a past and a future.

    ______

    in england you have ###, a group where people can make their own counter-archives !

    this is a way to take back control over own history!

    they are basically defined by their precarity.
    how to keep them (fire, rain, ...)?
    A) keep them in danger - but keep control/authority ?
    B) work with formal collection - but lose it?

    london had several archives destroyed ...
    * fire
    * thrown onto the street after eviction
    * currently being rained on (roof leaks)

    _____

    example:
            london squatting history forgetting black panthers in 1970s.
            "naming olive" archive.
            they wanted that history to feed right into brixton, 2019.
            ----------
            Olive Morris was born in jamaica (Windrush) - postcolonial movement after WW2, to return to centers of empires.
            she fought against racist harrassment, housing and women's rights, etc.
            squatted, and resquatted, the first private property in brixton, with liz obbey.

    ### became a center ... associated with reclaim the streets, had a printing press, etc.

    brixton has been totally gentrified.
    however: if we start to see the street as an archive, you can see the history in the street. we can unsettle in the way this street appears to us.

    Walking down the street, he sees "Here the panthers roared". This is a "historic perspective of the street" (###).





    Lukas: article for Partecipazione ed Conflitto (PaCo) onhorizontality in a squatting community

    &&& You can still publish articles there !

    Interested in self-management of occupied spaces.
    Studies "non-hierarchy" (###).
    Places without fixed position, where one is able to work "with nobody telling us what to do", nobody getting paid for "not nice" jobs.
    A logic of searching equality, to have no leaders, power relations to "press us to do some particular tasks".
    Like talking to the press, taking care of the space, etc.

    Ok - how do other collectives do it?
    To manage to deal with horizontality?
    ... to improve ability to self-manage better, be aware of mistakes/dangers, etc.


    Can be called "horizontal prefiguration" - Richard Gable (###) of "US new social movement"
    "Within the struggle we are focused on the way how we fight it" - practice, through which movement actors create a "conflation of goals and means"

    Thus, we might bridge "existential revolt" and "political revolution" - a place to invent, to try to have different everyday relations.

    Squatting seems perfect for this - as without ownership, you avoid a great deal of the usual hierarchy.

    This needs effort, invention of sophisticated forms of governance.

    ________

    I studied social anthropology, ethnography - currently as phd studies. multi-site ethnography.
    I go there, live there, i try to see problems appearing and methods of dealing with them.

    My method how to avoid an activist-academic problem, is to move out of my locality, and represent a researcher role.

    I ended up in a south france squat, anonymizing it as Cida (###)
    I anonymize it so they're not confronted with the research (??????)

    People rented a house, but place was gentrified. house was their common and safe space, with washing machine and kitchen, but they lived on the garden.
    They made public gigs there too. focused on agriculture a lot.

    In meetings, they called it "metel" ###
    They take a circle, give each-other 2 minutes.
    When you start a topic:
        * you first take opinion of all, without interruptions
        * if everyone talks, it's easier to be part of the discussion
    This tool makes them avoid discussion to be monopolised.
    Also to avoid tensions, conflict.

    [...]

    If a conflictive situation appears, it can be stopped and restarted.
    They try to be direct - to deal with tensions as soon as possible.

    I think it's fundamental to study these methodologies - assembly hand signals, etc.
    To study these small tools, how they are used.

    This is important to have non-hierarchical relationships.


    ____________

    q1: what when hierarchies are important? like, when you are doing electricity?

    "It can still be discussed!"
    For me, it's not possible to create an "ideal collective", where this would not happen.
    It's important to keep being reflexive - to invent ways, how to deal with it, without tensions.
    Also, it's about other things - like always spreading the knowledge, etc.


    Evening debate with Madrid activists from PAVPS, Carabanchel Housing Group and Sindicato de Inquilinas (Tenants' Union)

    Their presentations were recorded, after getting their permission. 


    *** Day 3 (Oct 26): EVALUATION MEETING (@ La Canica)

    See summary in another document


    <----------------------------- (now) ADD ABOVE










    Edit Site

    Edit CSS